Showing posts with label war on terror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war on terror. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 5, 2007

ETA Ceasefire ends - what's best policy in handling "terrorist group" ceasefires?

ETA - the group labelled "terrorist" by US, Spanish and other governments and institutions - struggles for an independent Basque homeland - to be carved out of Spanish sovereign territory.

They've had a 15 month ceasefire, and even launched negotiations with the Spanish government - seeking a diplomatic resolution.

Today they announced an end to their truce and a spokesman said it would “take action on all fronts to defend the Basque Country.”

(pic: Time Inc.)

Of course, they blamed the Zapatero Spanish government for their latest action.

Rather than engage in the blame game for this depressing development, let me pose a larger question:- how should governments respond when their terrorist-enemies declare ceasefires and truces? What is the best way to respond to them? --- accept them at face-value, use the opportunity to negotiate? or reject it out of hand as a ploy - perhaps to buy more time or ingratiate themselves with others?

In other words, how should governments react when their avowed enemies suddenly offer to lay down their arms????????

This question obviously is not confined to Spain. Israel, the US, turkey, Phillipines, Thailand and many other governments are fighting groups they call terrorists and insurgents.

My personal thoughts - generalized:- ceasefires and truces by all such groups should be supported by governments and others. Most of these conflicts do not have a military solution - inevitably it will be diplomats that forge a political solution - yes, a compromise - between the warring parties. Faced with that truth, the question then becomes one of timing:- when do we begin those negotiations - at the first opportunity? or delay for more advantage?

I don't think Spain made a mistake in talking to ETA. I can only hope that over the months of negotiations some good-will was established between the respective leaderships that may be preserved until the next ceasefire and inevitable round of negotiations. Let's hope they'll be more successful.

Monday, June 4, 2007

All Charges Dropped Against Gitmo Detainee

Third person to be charged under Bush Administration's "Military Tribunal" system of "law" has had all charges against him dismissed.

Khadr was 15 years old when he was captured - accused of throwing a grenade at US troops that caused several casualties.

Held for 5 years without seeing a court, he is now 20.

Charges dropped on a "technicality".

Despite having all charges dropped, it's expected he will remain at Guantanomo.

He is only the third detainee to be charged and brought before a military tribunal. The first David Hicks - an Aussie - also held for several years without trial has now returned to Australia where he is to serve less than a year behind bars.

What part of this story is the most shocking?! Your choice.